Phone:(215) 640-3339
Email:
info@efgp.org
 

» Sponsors
» EFGP Officers
» Why be a sponsor
» Apply now to become a sponsor
» August 8, 2006
Networking Party

Download the PDF File for this event
» July 11, 2006
Capital: Where To Find It; How To Get It

Download the PDF File for this event
» June 13, 2006
When Do You Need An Advisory Board And How To Acquire One

Download the PDF File for this event

The 10 Largest Companies on the Philadelphia 100 Prove That Size Does Not Hinder Ranking

Simple mathematics would have you believe that is easier for small company to rank higher on the Philadelphia 100 than a large company. The Philadelphia 100 is based on a two year growth rate and companies are ranked according to their growth rates. A smaller company would not need to increase revenues as much to achieve a higher ranking. For example, a $200,000 increase in revenues for a $1 million company is a 20% growth rate, a 2% growth rate for a $10 million company and 1% growth rate for a $50 million company. (Eligibility for the Philadelphia 100 requires the company to have at least $100,000 in revenues and not more than $35 million in revenues in the base year. The base year for the 2006 Philadelphia 100 was 2003.) Therefore, the common perception is that smaller companies have an advantage.

The theory does not hold true on the 2006 Philadelphia 100. For the10 companies with the highest revenues half ranked within the top 50 on the 2006 Philadelphia 100 and two were in the top 10. Incidentally, the numbers were similar for the 10 companies with smallest revenues where 5 were in the Top 50, but only 1 was in the top 10. In fact, four of the Top 10 had revenues in excess of $10 million, six had revenues in excess of $5 million and eight had revenues northward of $1 million.

While larger companies have the challenge of generating higher revenues to make the list, they have the advantage of resources and infrastructure to handle high increases in business. Larger companies tend to have more credibility in the market and spend less time convincing would be customers to use their products and services. Larger companies are approached more often with opportunities to grow their business.

Here are the 10 highest companies with the highest revenues on the 2006 Philadelphia 100:

Clearpoint Business Resources, Inc., Chalfont, PA
Michael Traina, CEO
2005 Revenues: $84.2 million
Growth Rate:762.4%
Rank 8th

The Siegfried Group, LLP, Wilmington, DE
Robert Siegfried, Jr., President & CEO
2005 Revenues: $77.8 million
Growth Rate:348.5%
Rank 24th

A&E Construction, Inc., Upper Darby, PA
William Santora, CEO
2005 Revenues: $70 million
Growth Rate:133.3%
Rank 60th

Infologix, Inc., Hatboro, PA
David Gulian, CEO
2005 Revenues $55.6 million
Growth Rate:90.9%
Rank 96th

EPAM Systems, Inc., Lawrencville, NJ
Arkadiy Dobkin, CEO
2005 Revenues: $40 million
Growth Rate: 143.2%
Rank 54th

Axis Construction Services, LLC, Conshohocken, PA
William Bostic, President
2005 Revenues: $35.1 million
Growth Rate: 538%
Rank 13th

Group9 Inc., Langhorne, PA
Christopher A. Ulsh, President & CEO
2005 Revenues: $32.9 million
Growth Rate: 94.2%
Rank 92nd

O’Neill Properties, King of Prussia, PA
J. Brian O’Neill, Founder & Chairman
2005 Revenues: $28.8 million
Growth Rate: 138.9%
Rank 55th

SunRx, Inc., Cherry Hill, NJ
Gerard Ferro, Chairman & CEO
2005 Revenues: $24.8 million
Growth Rate: 727.9%
Rank 9th

Gestalt, LLC, Camden, NJ
William Loftus, President & CEO
2005 Revenues: $24.2
Growth Rate: 230.7%
Rank 36th



General Contact Information:
One Liberty Place - Suite 690
Philadelphia, PA 19103

Tel: (215) 640-3339
Fax: (215) 640-3340
E-mail: info@efgp.org



[ Home ]       [ Store ]       [ About Us ]       [ Five Minute Forum]       [ News]

[ Events ]       [ Partners ]      [ Sponsors ]       [ Gallery ]


Copyright © 2003 All Rights Reserved.


Designed by Rome Technology Ltd.